A bold move has been made in the world of academic publishing, and it's shaking things up! The entire editorial team of Springer Nature's Journal of Philosophical Logic has resigned en masse, and they're not going quietly.
These editors, along with their executive and editorial board members, have decided to launch their own open-access journal, Philosophical Logic. But here's where it gets controversial: they're taking their expertise and roles with them, creating a new platform that directly competes with their former employer.
The Journal of Philosophical Logic, founded in 1972, has a rich history, but its editors felt the need for a change. They believe in the power of open access, and with the support of the Open Library of Humanities, they're making a stand for more accessible academic research.
"We support efforts to make academic research accessible to all. Recent launches of Diamond Open Access journals in Logic and Philosophy inspire us, and we aim to continue this momentum."
The new journal, Philosophical Logic, aims to maintain the high editorial standards set by its predecessor. It welcomes research from all areas of philosophical logic and even encourages contributions that explore the extensions of logic into new domains.
The Executive Board, comprised of long-time members of the philosophical logic community, believes that this new journal will carry on the vision of its founder, Nicholas Rescher. They're grateful for the long-term funding commitment from the Open Library of Humanities, which ensures the journal's sustainability.
This move is a bold statement about the future of academic publishing. It raises questions about the role of traditional publishers and the power of open access initiatives. Are we witnessing a shift towards more independent, community-driven platforms? Will this inspire other editors to follow suit?
What are your thoughts on this development? Do you think open access journals like Philosophical Logic will become the new norm? Share your opinions in the comments below!
